新冠肺炎三年後，疫苗如何影響接種者？

l 新冠肺炎疫苗因倉卒研發，並缺乏足夠時間實驗和觀察，三年過後，副作用逐漸浮現。

l 中國研發的疫苗，主要針對65歲以上⻑者，增加重症率、提高死亡率。

l 而對於外國而言，主要針對降低生育能力，甚至引致流產。

疫苗對生育率的影響

除了中國之外，外國亦開始警覺疫苗的副作用，包括對生育率的影響。雖然，疫苗對生育率的影響，需要以一個世代的出生率數值，才可以作正確評估。但現時所有疫苗，也是於緊急使用的保護傘下，跳過所有安全測試的實驗和步驟，經已為數以十億計的人注射。當然，我們下一代接種了這些免疫針後，對於生育能力的影響，現時根本無從得知，因為，這需要⻑達20年的研究和追蹤。但現時已經有人指出，疫苗對於成年人的生育影響，絕對是立竿見影。明顯，這是另一個有效方法，以減低嬰孩的出生，去應對四馬瘟疫。因為，已經有人研究出外國 mRNA 疫苗的成份，會影響男性精子的質素及生育能力。

同時，疫苗對孕婦亦會造成影響。事實上，有關接種疫苗後流產的事，我們亦時有聽聞。但當然，政府專家會說，這些流產事件與疫苗之間，並沒有必然性關連。
相關文章：
1個月現9宗打針後流產　食衞局：沒證據顯示接種增風險
醫生：若孕婦接種新冠疫苗後出現嚴重反應或影響胎兒

以下，是一位世界衛生理事會專家解釋，疫苗對生育能力的影響。
相關影片：The Most Disturbing Data Yet on “Vaccine” Infertility

I’m the member of the steering committee of the World Council for Health.
我是世界衛生理事會督導委員會的成員之一，

And we just released the first one describing the amount of side effects and death that have been reported so far.
我們剛公佈首份報告，講述迄今呈報的疫苗副作用和死亡數字。

And the next safety signals that, potential safety signal that I’ll be talking about today is the potential emerging fertility decline.
而下一個潛在的健康警號，也是今天我要分享的，就是生育能力下降問題。

So, the first interesting thing is if you look up and you take your browser and look for a Covid injection and fertility loss.
有趣的是，假若你網上搜尋新冠疫苗和生育能力喪失，

You come up with pages and pages of declining messages that tell you that there is no such thing as a potential fertility problem associated with the vaccine.
會出現一頁又一頁的內容，拒絕承認疫苗與潛在生育問題有關。

But keeping in mind that we need nine months in order to be pregnant and deliver a baby.
但請記住，婦女須懷孕九個月才能分娩，

Most of these comments were made within weeks and months of release of the vaccine.
大部份的評論，是在疫苗推出後的數周和數月內發佈，

So, for obvious reasons, we can’t say much more because the approval time of the vaccine has been about108 days.
顯然我們無法多說，因這批疫苗花了 108 天就通過批核。

I’m talking about BioNTech here.
所指的是輝瑞 BioNTech 疫苗，

And it usually would require at least 10 years, at least for all the other vaccines.
一般疫苗須經過至少 10 年的測試。

This has been the standard in order to see multi-generational chain potential consequences and also fertility problems, because you need to monitor more than one generation.
此標準沿用至今，從而看到數代後的潛在後果，以及生育問題，因為要監測超過一代人。

So, the next interesting thing is that usually if you start with the rollout of a medication.
更為有趣的是，當推出一種新藥物，

You have certain requirements and these include fertility signs and pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials and yet they were declared safe and effective for pregnant women.
是有特定要求的，包括寫明對生育的影響，然而，孕婦卻被排除在臨床測試之外，卻仍宣稱對孕婦安全和有效。

You can look up on all the boards of gynecology and obstetrics worldwide and they’re declared as safe.
你可查詢全球所有婦產科委員會，他們都宣稱疫苗對孕婦安全，

Whilst we actually don’t have any data to say this because as you can see here the primary completion date for the first study about pregnancy will be July 26 th .
實際上卻沒有任何數據支持，如你所見，首項有關疫苗對懷孕影響的項目，完成日期為7月26日。

So, we’ll see within the next few days, we will have some results.
按計劃數天後將會得出一些數據，

And for the pregnancies that fell into the original trial because 270 women got pregnant during that trial.
而原有試驗計劃中的孕婦，指 270 名在試驗期間懷孕的婦女。

The interesting thing was that there is no data provided for 238 pregnancies and there was one normal outcome in the rest of them and as you can see here the rest was spontaneous abortion, outcome pending, premature birth etc. etc.
特別地，其中 238 名孕婦的數據欠奉，並且只有 1 位孕婦的結果是正常，其餘的情況是自然流產、早產、結果待定等等。

So, what we have at the moment is not really reassuring that it is safe.
所以我們目前並不能保證疫苗安全，

But if we look at the studies again.
但如果我們重看這些研究，

[pregnant] women and women of childbearing potential were excluded because of fetal risk of lipid nano particles, mRNA and PEG.
孕婦和可能懷孕的婦女均被排除在外，因為脂質納米粒、信使核糖核酸和聚乙二醇對胎兒構成風險。

So, that was done right from the start and no further studies on reproductive health were done either from Moderna and Pfizer which usually as I just mentioned is a standard for authorization of a drug.
所以一開始已排除了她們，無論是莫德納和輝瑞，都沒有就疫苗對生殖健康另作研究，如剛才提到，那是藥物授權的標準。
==========
於這裡，專家指，疫苗是於短時間內研發，因此，根本沒有對生殖健康的影響作出研究。
==========

The only data we have is from experiments with rats and that was done by Moderna and BioNTech.
我們唯一的數據是以老鼠進行實驗，來自莫德納和 BioNTech，

And you can see the title of the study. 你可以看到研究的標題， The lack of effects on female fertility and prenatal, postnatal offspring.
疫苗對女性的生育能力、產前及產後未見影響，

What the data clearly actually shows that there is a doubling of pre-implantation loss so a loss of the fetus with the BioNTech and there was also one of as we can see here in Moderna doubling the rate of lost pregnancies.
但數據卻清楚表明胚胎著床的失敗率會翻倍，即接種 BioNTech 疫苗增加流產風險，還有一樣是關於莫德納疫苗，就是流產率翻倍。

So, it’s interesting to see that the title of the paper was actually that there is a lack of effect which certainly cannot be concluded from reading the trials.
有趣的是，研究的標題指未見影響，我們顯然無法從該試驗作出此結論。

And that was done with 44 rats and was done over a period of 42 days.
科學家對 44 隻老鼠進行為期 42 天的試驗，

That doesn’t fulfill requirements that it won’t harm the next generation.
這並不符合標準，來宣稱對下一代無害。

Very interesting enough, all participating scientists that have been there were employed or had owned shares of Pfizer and BioNTech.
有趣的是，所有參與研究的科學家，皆受聘於輝瑞和 BioNTech，或擁有其股份，

And they tried to hide this by just using their initials.
他們用姓名的首字母隱藏身份。

==========
於這裡，專家進一步指出，輝瑞和 BioNTech，只是以老鼠作為實驗，但已出現流產率增加的風險，科學家卻仍聲稱對下一代無害。
==========

So, the other thing from these trials that we know that the results of the number of fetuses to have birth defects which is an extra rib in the vaccinated group was 295% higher than the unvaccinated group.
另外，試驗結果顯示，胎兒患先天缺陷的數量，在接種疫苗的組別中，增生額外肋骨的機會，對比沒有接種的組別，高出295%。

So, we do have clear signs that there is some potential of harm to the fetus as well through that.
數據清楚顯示，疫苗或會對胎兒構成危害。

==========
於這裡，接種疫苗的組別，胎兒患先天缺陷的數目，竟然比沒有接種的組別高出295%。
==========

But we don’t have any other data so far at the moment.
然而迄今我們沒有其他數據，

And as we know fertility is something that by definition requires a long-term monitoring and no studies had been done in order to do that.
如我們所知，對生育能力的影響須長時間監測，現時暫未有這方面的研究。

So, an early sign that was a little bit worrying.
這種早期的徵兆令人憂慮，

I don’t know if you remember, that in Canada as well.
加拿大也有多宗報告，

There were many reports of women with menstrual problems.
指女性在注射疫苗後出現經血問題。

So, by September 2021, there were over 30,000 reports of women in the UK.
截至 2021 年 9 月，英國有逾 3 萬宗相關報告，

And a recent study, one was just released in the last two days, talked about 40%
兩日前剛發佈的一項研究顯示有 40%女性。

But there is another study here that I mentioned with 42% of women reporting abnormal heavy bleeding after the Covid vaccinations.
另有研究指 42%女性報告相關問題，即注射新冠疫苗後經血過多，

And if you look at the data of the side effects, you can see the elevation.
你可參閱副作用的數據來了解升幅，
The number one symptom on the list is actually menstrual bleeding, an elevation of 8,800 times.
排首位的症狀就是經血問題，升幅達 8,800 倍。

==========
於這裡，根據英國研究數據顯示，接種新冠疫苗後，女性出現經血問題的升幅，竟然高達8,800倍。
==========

So, another sign of that was that in the University of Chicago.
芝加哥大學的研究亦顯示相關問題，

They hoped to find 500 women that had experienced post-vaccination menstrual irregularities.
起初招募 500 位注射疫苗後出現經血異常的女士，

And within a few weeks there were 140,000 women reporting.
但在數星期內便收到 14 萬位女士回應。

And, So, another study showed that the rate of that is 1,000-fold greater than the flu vaccine.
另一項研究顯示，接種新冠疫苗後經血過多的情況，比接種流感疫苗後高出1,000 倍。

疫苗副作用日漸浮現

根據以上種種，日華牧師分析，明顯，不同國家的疫苗，是針對不同國家的社會實況而設。對於中國而言，是針對65歲以上⻑者，讓他們重症率增加、提高死亡率。但對於外國而言，則是針對男女的生育情況，降低他們的生育能力，甚至製造流產。

上述兩者，目的也是為了減少人口、減輕政府和社會的負擔，以面對將要來的四馬瘟疫審判。這些現象讓我們知道，必定不是偶然，而是刻意的設計。因為，即使免疫針裡，只是一些葡萄糖水或清水，也不可能產生這種指定性效果、出現如此精準的副作用。所以，內裡必然有一些物質，可以達到這些指定效果。

藥廠高層迴避疫苗成效

而香港，由於接受國產及外國疫苗，可混合「溝針」使用，因此，兩者的禍害，也會隨著注射的針數，不斷產生疊加效應。

從這角度來看，我們便會明白，既然，這是一個由各國政府背後聯手，共同執行的社會實驗，自然，當這些藥廠高層被質問，有關疫苗的有效性和禍害時，他們亦可以如此傲慢，視所有人如同毫無價值的螻蟻般。
相關影片：Watch Pfizer CEO’s Face When Asked the One Question He Fears